Skip to main content

My Belated Friday the 13th Post

The great trifecta of horror: Halloween, Nightmare on Elm Street, & Friday the 13th. I've been tackling them, one at a time, and being that yesterday was (in fact) Friday the 13th, it seemed a fitting time to finally write about the movie.

Before I jump into the movie itself, let's talk for a minute about why these three film franchises are so very important to the horror genre. Each falls into the subgenre of "slasher films" which are commonly believed to have grown out of Psycho and Peeping Tom. The ways in which they conform to and break free of that genre makes them interesting, influential, and lasting.

Everything about these movies, down to their names, is designed to elicit fear in it's viewers.

Halloween - A day when it's believed that sprits can walk the Earth amongst the living.
Directed by John Carpenter. Released in 1978.

What's it got?
  • Halloween is remarkably "un-gory" (much like Psycho itself.) Being considered a large piece of "exploitation cinema" and bearing a name that implies a graphic kind of killing, being subtle is unusual.
  • Killer POV. Although borrowed from Psycho and Peeping Tom, Halloween is unique among is peers for offering us the killer's perspective during murders. The true beauty of the killer POV is that it implicates the audience in the murders; making us more than just coconspirators it turns us into killers ourselves. (We'll see this again in Friday the 13th.)
  • It's got a nod to the Final Girl. Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) very nearly defeats the killer on her own. She's a step closer to being a Final Girl than any of the B movie queens of the 50's but she actually pales in comparison to Sally Hardesty (Marilyn Burns) of Texas Chainsaw Massacre or even Nancy Thompson (Heather Langenkamp) of Nightmare on Elm Street.


Nightmare on Elm Street - Nightmares, terrible dreams that scare us.
Directed by Wes Craven. Released in 1984.

What's it got? (I'll keep this one short since I just wrote about it a few days ago.)
  • Personality! Freddy is no mindless killing machine - he's a true character.
  • A great Final Girl. Nancy doesn't just escape by accident, she proactively defeats Freddy.
  • A terrific gore factor. 


Friday the 13th - Traditionally believed to be an unlucky day when bad things happen.

Directed by Sean Cunningham. Released 1980.

What's it got?
  • A female killer. Not as uncommon nowadays but fairly irregular when it was released. Particularly when looking as slasher movies. There's a gender argument to be made here - one that revolves around genitalia and penetration - but I'll leave that be for now.
  • Red herrings and a twist ending. Friday the 13th is one of the primary forerunners in the art of tossing out plenty of "fake leads", implied guilt, and possible suspects, none of which tell the audience who the killer really is.
  • A morality lesson (that we now think of as, "common place" in a slasher film.) We all know who dies in a horror movie: the kids who have pre-marital sex, the kids who use drugs, the kids who "misbehave" or otherwise break polite societal rules.
So, Friday the 13th. Man oh man did mainstream critics hate this movie when it came out. Which, as we all know, is usually reason enough for audience's to love something. And, despite that mainstream slamming, Friday the 13th has gone on to become a much loved, genre "classic." (The magic of bad press, I tell you.)

I think one of the most interesting things about this movie is that you're really routing for the villain. You really love to hate the group of terrorized kids - they're completely douchey - and you really just want Jason to hack them to bits in creative and excessive ways.

Half the fun of a good slasher flick is tabulating and discussing the various ways the characters are dispatched. It's like a game: who do you think will be the next to die and how will it happen?

Despite what critics tell you, you don't need to feel bad. It's okay to hate those kids. The killing isn't real. It's only a movie. You're not some deranged sicko. Rejoice in your vicarious killing.

But seriously though, this kind of horror breeds audience participation and regardless of the gruesome nature of the material, it truly engages people's imaginations. As well as their critical thinking skills; when you're not betting on who bites it next, you're often discussing how you would escape or how you would defeat the killer.


Okay. Okay. Wrap up time.

Us horror fans owe a lot to the original Halloween, Nightmare on Elm Street, and Friday the 13th movies. Despite criticisms, remakes, reboots, and countless sequels, these original pieces will forever remain pillars in the horror genre foundation.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Witch (2015)

You know the drill - there's ALWAYS spoilers. Don't want the movie ruined for you, come back after you've seen it. Also - I'm still without an editor - typos and bad grammar await you! I keep hoping that the cultural obsession with zombies will end; literally every other damn movie that comes 'round seems to feature some sort of shambling, undead being bent on devouring the weak flesh of regular humans. Once upon a time, zombies have have been used as a metaphor for the blind consumerism created by our capitalist society, or the perceived depletion of resources by immigrants, or even the ravages of time and disease on our frail bodies. Now it seems that the deeper social commentary has been lost as audiences mindlessly consume "zombie fiction" in an attempt to keep up with trends. ( How very meta - a film buddy of mine commented on this assessment! ) All of this is just a sideways rant, leading up to my actual point: it seems that zombie may actually...
1 comment
Read more

Mother!

Alright friends and readers–this one is probably doubly filled with typos and grammar errors because I wrote it while angry. Good luck and happy reading. There are unpopular opinions in every realm. As a film student, you can truly strike a nerve when you say things like, "I fucking hate the self-indulgence of independent films and the way people idolize them." Or, you know, "Low lighting and slow pacing does not a good movie make." Or whatever. You can of course, objectively, understand how this happens. When you are creating art–when you are outside the system  so to speak–you are free to explore things (subjects, techniques, etc.) that may need to be addressed and that freedom can become intoxicating and go to one's head. While it may seem only right  or only fair  to respect and accept each creative endeavor that every artist undertakes, it is unreasonable to believe that the world will remain forever patient with the self-obsession artists have. Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Babadook

Spoilers and typos! Enjoy. We often look back nostalgically on childhood, envious of the joy we felt and the boundless imaginations we possessed. How conveniently we forget the other side of that coin: as children, we experience a depth of terror our adult selves continually try to recreate for cathartic entertainment. When we try to bring those childhood fears to life on the screen, we often end up with movies about "things that go bump in the night," which is a somewhat superficial approach. While it does provide an opportunity for a supernatural experience, it ignores the root of our fear: the unknown . As children, we lack life experience. We lack nuance. We lack understanding. Not knowing creates in us fear. Yes, we fear what lurks in the darkness but we also fear the adult world because we do not understand how it works. The Babadook works to exploit both  those fears. The short story: a widowed mother of a young boy experiences a mental breakdown and tries to...
Post a Comment
Read more