Skip to main content

Bug: paranoia, terror, and redemption.

I've been ignoring Bug for years - which is silly because it's directed by William Friedkin (best known for directing The French Connection and The Exorcist in the 70's).

Perhaps it's the cover: It looks like some super-low budget, "independent movie" about some kind of giant cockroach infestation. (Like that segment in Creepshow, "They're creeping up on you!" where the germ-o-phobic old man's apartment is flooded with bugs - classic!) Now, I'm not scared of bugs, per se, but I'm just not excited about bug movies.

Side note: Way back in college, I remember reading an article about why humans hate swarms of things (written from a sociology perspective) and why we thus feel frightened by subcultures and minorities. Great article - wish I could remember the details so I could write more about it here. You'll have to rely on your own Google-fu to track down this terrific piece of writing.

So recently (and I use "recently" in that typical way that I do which has little or no relation to actual time). I read though Rue Morgue's 200 Alternative Horror Movies You Need To See, and I decided to give Bug a chance.

Here's what happened: I didn't immediately fall in love with Ashley Judd but I am always impressed with her range and the ease with which she plays the perfect, stereo-typical-no-class-white-trash-un-educated broad. There's always something so genuine about her, regardless of who she's playing.

Michael Shannon, who I can only think of as his character in "Cecil B Demented," actually impressed me, as well. I'm sure people know him now, from larger movies (2013's Man of Steel, for one) but I never really considered him an actor of any note. Dear Michael Shannon, this is me, apologizing to you. 

 Even after reading about the movie, I was still surprised by the nail-biting tension that built through the entire movie. The chemistry between Ashley Judd and Michael Shannon is fantastic; they play their insanity off one another so seamlessly - you could almost imagine that they're both actually nuts (and made for one another).

But the end of the movie... the level of insanity achieved within the last few moments was possibly too much for me to appreciate. While paranoia is a great idea to flirt with, Friedkin was a bit heavy-handed, leaning too hard on challenging the idea that they were paranoid, implying that there really was "something bigger" going on. And I think that actually turned me off a bit because the "something bigger" seemed to be "aliens" and boy oh boy am I disinterested in alien movies. (Well - evil, dabbling, abducting, human-farming, aliens).

Overall: I'm glad I finally broke down and gave it a chance (Thanks, Rue Morgue) but I won't be running out to buy a copy any time soon.


Watch the trailer here:
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Witch (2015)

You know the drill - there's ALWAYS spoilers. Don't want the movie ruined for you, come back after you've seen it. Also - I'm still without an editor - typos and bad grammar await you! I keep hoping that the cultural obsession with zombies will end; literally every other damn movie that comes 'round seems to feature some sort of shambling, undead being bent on devouring the weak flesh of regular humans. Once upon a time, zombies have have been used as a metaphor for the blind consumerism created by our capitalist society, or the perceived depletion of resources by immigrants, or even the ravages of time and disease on our frail bodies. Now it seems that the deeper social commentary has been lost as audiences mindlessly consume "zombie fiction" in an attempt to keep up with trends. ( How very meta - a film buddy of mine commented on this assessment! ) All of this is just a sideways rant, leading up to my actual point: it seems that zombie may actually...
1 comment
Read more

Mother!

Alright friends and readers–this one is probably doubly filled with typos and grammar errors because I wrote it while angry. Good luck and happy reading. There are unpopular opinions in every realm. As a film student, you can truly strike a nerve when you say things like, "I fucking hate the self-indulgence of independent films and the way people idolize them." Or, you know, "Low lighting and slow pacing does not a good movie make." Or whatever. You can of course, objectively, understand how this happens. When you are creating art–when you are outside the system  so to speak–you are free to explore things (subjects, techniques, etc.) that may need to be addressed and that freedom can become intoxicating and go to one's head. While it may seem only right  or only fair  to respect and accept each creative endeavor that every artist undertakes, it is unreasonable to believe that the world will remain forever patient with the self-obsession artists have. Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Babadook

Spoilers and typos! Enjoy. We often look back nostalgically on childhood, envious of the joy we felt and the boundless imaginations we possessed. How conveniently we forget the other side of that coin: as children, we experience a depth of terror our adult selves continually try to recreate for cathartic entertainment. When we try to bring those childhood fears to life on the screen, we often end up with movies about "things that go bump in the night," which is a somewhat superficial approach. While it does provide an opportunity for a supernatural experience, it ignores the root of our fear: the unknown . As children, we lack life experience. We lack nuance. We lack understanding. Not knowing creates in us fear. Yes, we fear what lurks in the darkness but we also fear the adult world because we do not understand how it works. The Babadook works to exploit both  those fears. The short story: a widowed mother of a young boy experiences a mental breakdown and tries to...
Post a Comment
Read more