Skip to main content

Devil (Sans Twist)

At this point it's a fairly well-known joke that M. Night Shyamalan's movie formula concludes with some sort of mind-bending, life-altering "twist" at the end of each film. While this joke (like any stereotype or cliche) is grounded in truth, it completely over-looks Shyamalan's skill as a story-teller.

Let me pause here while many of you become riled up.

I'm not, by any means, saying that Shyamalan is the best director. I'm also not saying that you need to like his movies. What I am saying is that he has immense talent for crafting a story.

There are few writers out there in Hollywood who are as accomplished as Shyamalan. Throughout each of his movies, there are clues and hints and layers of subtext that he communicates both visually and through carefully structured dialog. Seriously. Like the plots or not, he is a great writer.

When Shyamalan became a known entity in Hollywood, the other major component of his films (aside from the twist) was his non-American pacing; look back at The Sixth Sense or Unbreakable and you'll find movies that move along slowly, precisely, even meditatively. This snail's pace allows the audience to really THINK ABOUT what's happening. They should be immersed in the movie and catching those subtle, intentional semantic choices Shyamalan makes with language and dialog.

Sometimes, all I want is a movie that pokes at my brain and makes me actually work to figure out what's going on.

Now, maybe it's the pressure of overcoming the joke he's become but Shyamalan has really been phoning it in. I decided to watch Devil (his most recent writing effort - he did not direct this one), despite feeling Shyamalan had already done his best work. I didn't have much in the way of expectations, which is good, because I would have been more annoyed at the end of the movie had I expectations to compare it to.

While prepping to write this blog, I thought a lot about my intro paragraph and how best to sum up Devil and could come up with nothing better than the following:

This is my completely dispassionate review of the movie Devil. I felt so little about it that when the credits rolled I didn't even both to rate the title (on my Netflix). The movie wasn't especially bad; I just didn't like it.

I guess there's nowhere but up to go from such a brilliantly pathetic opening, so let me try to tackle a few specifics about the movie.

The Cast

The majority of the cast falls into that B-list, sort-of-famous bucket. You'll likely recognize the star (Chris Messina) from Damages but don't expect the same level of performance out of him. I don't know if he was sleeping through rehearsal on this movie or he just wasn't feeling it or maybe the directing team just didn't know how to guide their actors. You'll also probably recognize Logan Marshall-Green (who came to a messy end in Prometheus), who doesn't really have a huge range but, he's so charming and plays "genuine" better than most do. He's really great at conveying, "I'm just a guy trying to do my thing and I'm not complicated so I'm not hiding anything and you can really, truly just trust me."

The Plot

Just left me rolling my eyes. I think this goes back to something I was writing about recently which is that I'm completely un-moved by religious stories, motivations, plots, whatever. I couldn't really get into this movie because the concept of The Devil just doesn't scare me. The two-ish twists were poorly written and hardly innovative. 

The Setting

I will admit that the cinematography and set locations had some interesting elements; shooting primarily inside an elevator is ambitious, to say the least. I won't go so far as to call it completely successful but it did allow for some of the necessary claustrophobia needed to fuel the story. The outdoor shots of the city were reminiscent of The Devil's Advocate and carried some of the same malice-tinged loneliness and frightening desperation we each sometimes feel. 

Alright - I'm honestly hard-pressed to write much more on this one so, check out the trailer and watch the movie at your own risk (of immense boredom).



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rebuttal: 17 Disturbing Horror Movies You Will Never Watch Again

When I'm not watching movies, I'm reading about movies. I stumble across all kinds of articles, blog posts, book excerpts, etc. in my quest to absorb as much movie knowledge as possible. Now, I'm snotty and loud-mouthed and opinionated but I'd never begrudge another human their opinion. Seriously. You're absolutely welcome to have any opinion about any thing you want. However, I must warn you, if I think your opinion is stupid, I'm absolutely going to say so. I've recently stumbled on an article completely  brimming with so many idiotic opinions that I'm actually compelled to craft a response. Here's the gist of the original article: there are some horror movies out there that are so disturbing , you'll only ever want to watch them once. I've have taken her original list and refuted her claims without pulling her entire article over. You can read the original article here . Let's start at the beginning, with her opening statement

What Is Genre And Why Should I Care?

There are terms that always seem to come up when talking about films: director, actor, plot, theme, score, etc. These terms are all self-explanatory; no one ever asks, ‘what’s a director?’ However, there are other terms that are equally common but less clear: genre, sub-genre, auteur, oeuvre, etc. These terms are more abstract then ‘director’ or ‘actor.’ It is entirely likely that someone will ask, ‘what is genre, anyway?’ This question specifically is what I will be answering with this paper. The answer to the question ‘what is genre,’ is multi-layered: genre is a means of classification. Genre is a means of communication. Genre is a means of understanding films. Genre is a means of relating to films. To one person all movies rated “PG” are a genre – possibly one also known as “children’s movies” – while to another all movies with similar topics treated in similar ways are a genre: i.e. movies dealing with frontier life depicted in a nostalgic manner are a genre often kn

Contracted Or I Just Watched A Zombie Movie

Seems like horror fans fall into two buckets these days: zombie lovers and zombie haters. That dividing line just keeps getting deeper and darker the more zombies gain "mainstream popularity". I currently fall into the "I am so tired of zombies I could puke" bucket. I haven't stopped  watching zombie movies so much as I've started avoiding them at all costs, literally watching every other subgenre offering I stumble onto, regardless of how terrible it is. I seriously re-watched Wishmaster  this past week. That's how far out of my way I've been going to avoid the significant number of zombie movies flooding Netflix. Then I accidentally watched one. Contracted - 2013 I'm sure it was partially due to the really terrible movie synopsis that Netflix provided, which I'm prepared to admit that they may have nothing to do with and  that I likely didn't read it very well. In a strange twist of events, the movie cover actually helped