Skip to main content

Direct To Video Picks For June 2014 - Stephen King

Have you guys missed my direct to video picks? I let them die off a while back but thought I'd try to resurrect them for the summer. I also thought I'd try something a bit different and combine two of my previous endeavors into one: direct to video picks and made for TV horror. With that, I give you a sampling of Stephen King stories brought to life for the small screen.

Now, you're probably wondering if I'm going to compare these film versions to the original books and I have to confess that I'm not - mostly because I'm not a huge fan of Stephen King as an author so I actually haven't read all of these. To be more precise, I've hardly read any of them!

I'm also not as "qualified" to write about literature as I am movies and so I'll leave that task to others more skilled than myself.

I do invite any King fans out there to share your thoughts and feelings on how these stories were translated into movies. (Successfully? Faithfully? Terribly?!) And, of course, let me know of others you've liked better!

"Made For TV" 

Before we get into the individual movies for this month, let's talk a bit about made for TV movies. There's something laughably pathetic about made for TV movies; generally produced with fairly small budgets,  "second-rate" directors, "B-list" or "has-been" actors, and written by people who are better equipped to pen shorter stories, made for TV fare is typically inferior to big-screen offerings. 

Made for TV movies have this way of always looking cheap and rushed and slapped together. I feel like the worst part of any made for TV movie is really the acting. I don't know if it's because they are full of b-list actors or if the tiny budgets mean shorter production schedules which mean fewer takes, etc. 

I also feel like there is definitely a different mindset to creating a movie that will only ever be viewed on a small screen VS something to be viewed in a theatre, with a huge sound-system, etc. and while that shouldn't effect the quality of the movie, it certainly seems to.

These two things seem to be directly related; small screen directing breeds small screen acting.

In the case of this month's picks, you may be inclined to believe that the source material would help improve the quality of the movies. If that's the case, you can stop believing that now.

And on that note, here are my movie picks for this month.

Sometimes They Come Back (1991)

The $.25 version: boy witnesses the murder of his brother and subsequent death of the killers. Later in life, the killers' ghosts come back to haunt him. Bad things happen.

Without doing any reading or research on Stephen King's life, I can only imagine that he had a terrible childhood. His movies are filled with awful childhood secrets, accidents, catastrophes, etc. Evil kids. Murderous kids. Drownings. Abuse. You name it, it's here in his stuff.

It is also possible that he's simply one of the more honest authors out there, allowing the children of his stories to experience the often terribly adult situations they're likely to encounter.

Oh and children are assholes.  

So, if we scrap all the details, what does this movie tell us? The mistakes of our past will come back to haunt us until we make amends or maybe, each of us has a childhood secret that shaped us into the adults we are and even if the secret is something terrible, we can still become functional people. Better yet, the message may be that our loved ones will always be with us, even after they die.

Yup. I'm sure it's one of those things.

Truly not the worst movie ever to hit the small screen but also not worth more than a single viewing; I can confidently write this having seen it at least twice in my life.

And. For some unexplainable reason, someone, somewhere thought this movie was good enough to spin off two sequels.

WHAT?!...money-grubbing bastards.

The $.25 version: something about airplanes and time travel and, uh, human interactions? And then there are... monsters? Things. Something. (This is a great example of terrible special effects, by the way.)

This has always been one of my least favorites of the billion (perhaps this is a slight exaggeration) made-for-TV pieces Steven King has produced over the years. 

So you may be asking me why it's landed on my suggestion list and I'll be honest here when I write, it's better than some of the crap shows that are made for TV. (Warehouse 13? Fuck that show and it's popularity. It's just a ripped off, poor man's version of Friday the 13th the Series.)

Super, major bonus today, guys: you can watch the FULL MOVIE right here on my blog!

The $.25 version: thanks to science, the world has been devastated by some sort of plague. Not surprisingly, some lucky (?) folks are immune to this plague and must face other apocalyptic challenges. The battle between good and evil? You've got it.

I have little statistical data (and don't really care enough to gather any) to verify this but I'm fairly certain that The Stand is the best of King's TV epics. It's certainly the one I've seen (and enjoyed) the most. 

And it's the one that holds up the best over time; the effects aren't terrible and the acting is pretty good and the cast was famous enough at the time to stay relevant well past it's creation date.

It's also one of the few books of his that I've actually read and, after tackling the "re-issued" edition with about 10 million pages put back in, I've got to say, I truly appreciate the TV version.



The Tommyknockers (1993)

The $.25 version: something about aliens and glowing rocks and sex. Wait. Did I miss anything?

Starring everyone's favorite model-turned-actress-perpetually-kicking-ass-on-TV Marg Helgenberger as a bored housewife turned nympho by alien intervention - or something to that effect.

Maybe that's just what I wanted to happen... maybe she really turns into a gadget-building, Type-A maniac.

Got to say, that's significantly less exciting.


You can watch the trailer here:

A few others.

Bag of Bones - a rip off of In Dreams, which was originally a book, too.
Rose Red - a rip off of House of Leaves, a book I could never finish and never "got" why people love.

And the complete list, un-reviewed by me.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Witch (2015)

You know the drill - there's ALWAYS spoilers. Don't want the movie ruined for you, come back after you've seen it. Also - I'm still without an editor - typos and bad grammar await you! I keep hoping that the cultural obsession with zombies will end; literally every other damn movie that comes 'round seems to feature some sort of shambling, undead being bent on devouring the weak flesh of regular humans. Once upon a time, zombies have have been used as a metaphor for the blind consumerism created by our capitalist society, or the perceived depletion of resources by immigrants, or even the ravages of time and disease on our frail bodies. Now it seems that the deeper social commentary has been lost as audiences mindlessly consume "zombie fiction" in an attempt to keep up with trends. ( How very meta - a film buddy of mine commented on this assessment! ) All of this is just a sideways rant, leading up to my actual point: it seems that zombie may actually...
1 comment
Read more

Mother!

Alright friends and readers–this one is probably doubly filled with typos and grammar errors because I wrote it while angry. Good luck and happy reading. There are unpopular opinions in every realm. As a film student, you can truly strike a nerve when you say things like, "I fucking hate the self-indulgence of independent films and the way people idolize them." Or, you know, "Low lighting and slow pacing does not a good movie make." Or whatever. You can of course, objectively, understand how this happens. When you are creating art–when you are outside the system  so to speak–you are free to explore things (subjects, techniques, etc.) that may need to be addressed and that freedom can become intoxicating and go to one's head. While it may seem only right  or only fair  to respect and accept each creative endeavor that every artist undertakes, it is unreasonable to believe that the world will remain forever patient with the self-obsession artists have. Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Babadook

Spoilers and typos! Enjoy. We often look back nostalgically on childhood, envious of the joy we felt and the boundless imaginations we possessed. How conveniently we forget the other side of that coin: as children, we experience a depth of terror our adult selves continually try to recreate for cathartic entertainment. When we try to bring those childhood fears to life on the screen, we often end up with movies about "things that go bump in the night," which is a somewhat superficial approach. While it does provide an opportunity for a supernatural experience, it ignores the root of our fear: the unknown . As children, we lack life experience. We lack nuance. We lack understanding. Not knowing creates in us fear. Yes, we fear what lurks in the darkness but we also fear the adult world because we do not understand how it works. The Babadook works to exploit both  those fears. The short story: a widowed mother of a young boy experiences a mental breakdown and tries to...
Post a Comment
Read more