Skip to main content

Mine Games

I'm two minutes into this movie and I'm thinking: "Oh great, another group of teenagers in a van movie". There's the smart quiet one and the annoying (sort of stupid) one and one with documented mental health problems AND one who is "kind of psychic" and so on and so forth. These kids look like they climbed down off some GAP billboard and drove off into the woods for an ill fated vacation.

Mine Games is like the strange bastard offspring of The Ruins and Donnie Darko (with a dash of The Butterfly Effect thrown in). Trying desperately to be a great "timelines aren't linear BUT circular" movie (like Twelve Monkeys or Timecrimes), Mine Games just ends up feeling amateurish and half-baked.

On paper, there's something really compelling about this movie - being stuck an in infinite loop is a great story line. There's a great opportunity for the characters and the audience to uncover bits of the mystery as the story cycles infinitely around. There's great potential to explore the nature of personality, to question "fate", and to discuss how making small changes in the world can have SIGNIFICANT repercussions.

This concept can get really interesting when you look at all of the possible branches: the characters can be completely doomed to repeat their exact actions forever or they can make changes as they become aware of the situation. If they make changes, are they changes for good? How will they know? What if all of the characters need to make the same change in order to break the cycle? What if they each need to make different ones? This philosophical contemplation can go on and on forever.

They did do a nice job of littering the pieces of the mystery throughout the movie. You'll be happy to hear that they do connect the pieces together in the end to fully articulate the loop. Unfortunately, they fall into that American horror movie trap of over explaining things; I'm not an idiot, guys. I've watched a lot of movies and I can figure shit out on my own. But thanks...

The thing that really broke the whole movie for me was the new-age-hippy-psychic girl who claims she can talk to spirits and then actually sees her living friends in their dead, decaying states. It's almost American Werewolfian in nature. It was also completely distracting for me; I could have bought into the scifi-esque plot of an endlessly looping timeline had they not tried to throw ghosts at me, too. It's really just too much fantasy in my scifi to be enjoyable. Really, I consider this a missed opportunity by an inexperienced or uncreative writer. They could have accomplished the same plot trajectory by "unsticking" her in time; were she somehow "outside the time loop," she could be privy to the knowledge of what awaited her friends further around the circle. This would have kept the thematic material more consistent and made the movie stronger overall.

On the other side of this coin, the atmosphere of the movie is very haunted house-ish which does actually work. That piece is a nice juxtaposition with the scifi plotline. Looking at the movie through this lens, there is something interesting in the way they present the elements of a haunting, traditional "ghosts" are actually "echoes" of the characters' own past actions. The feeling that "something is lingering" is definitely creepy and is emphasised by some really great cinematography. The way Mine Games handles "echoes from the past" and "a descent into madness" really reminded me of YellowBrickRoad. They may actually become the next pair of movies I can't tell apart.

The other big distractors for me were the sets and locations. The abandoned mine is incredibly clean for an ancient (or even, really old) place. It's all too obviously shot in some touristy location like Howe Caverns or Seneca Caverns. I had a hard time believing there wasn't a group of 30 school kids hanging out just around the next corner learning the difference between stalagmites and stalactites. Which, by the way, if you've ever been to one of those touristy caves, they will tell you is that stalactites hold tight to the ceiling and stalagmites might reach reach the ceiling. Thanks, science.

Time for the wrap up, folks.
I'll say this, there was a lot of potential in Mine Games that just never got realized. Perhaps, 20 years from now, someone will get the itch to remake it and we'll get a masterpiece of cinema. And pigs? Well, they'll all have wings by then.

Watch this one if you need a fix of dumb kids having a really, really bad vacation.

If you'd like to seek a second opinion, you can read the review of Mine Games on Bloody Disgusting. Spoiler alert: the diagnosis is the same. Looks like I'm not the only cranky movie reviewer out there.

You can watch the Mine Game's trailer here:


Popular posts from this blog

Rebuttal: 17 Disturbing Horror Movies You Will Never Watch Again

When I'm not watching movies, I'm reading about movies. I stumble across all kinds of articles, blog posts, book excerpts, etc. in my quest to absorb as much movie knowledge as possible. Now, I'm snotty and loud-mouthed and opinionated but I'd never begrudge another human their opinion. Seriously. You're absolutely welcome to have any opinion about any thing you want. However, I must warn you, if I think your opinion is stupid, I'm absolutely going to say so. I've recently stumbled on an article completely  brimming with so many idiotic opinions that I'm actually compelled to craft a response. Here's the gist of the original article: there are some horror movies out there that are so disturbing , you'll only ever want to watch them once. I've have taken her original list and refuted her claims without pulling her entire article over. You can read the original article here . Let's start at the beginning, with her opening statement

What Is Genre And Why Should I Care?

There are terms that always seem to come up when talking about films: director, actor, plot, theme, score, etc. These terms are all self-explanatory; no one ever asks, ‘what’s a director?’ However, there are other terms that are equally common but less clear: genre, sub-genre, auteur, oeuvre, etc. These terms are more abstract then ‘director’ or ‘actor.’ It is entirely likely that someone will ask, ‘what is genre, anyway?’ This question specifically is what I will be answering with this paper. The answer to the question ‘what is genre,’ is multi-layered: genre is a means of classification. Genre is a means of communication. Genre is a means of understanding films. Genre is a means of relating to films. To one person all movies rated “PG” are a genre – possibly one also known as “children’s movies” – while to another all movies with similar topics treated in similar ways are a genre: i.e. movies dealing with frontier life depicted in a nostalgic manner are a genre often kn

Contracted Or I Just Watched A Zombie Movie

Seems like horror fans fall into two buckets these days: zombie lovers and zombie haters. That dividing line just keeps getting deeper and darker the more zombies gain "mainstream popularity". I currently fall into the "I am so tired of zombies I could puke" bucket. I haven't stopped  watching zombie movies so much as I've started avoiding them at all costs, literally watching every other subgenre offering I stumble onto, regardless of how terrible it is. I seriously re-watched Wishmaster  this past week. That's how far out of my way I've been going to avoid the significant number of zombie movies flooding Netflix. Then I accidentally watched one. Contracted - 2013 I'm sure it was partially due to the really terrible movie synopsis that Netflix provided, which I'm prepared to admit that they may have nothing to do with and  that I likely didn't read it very well. In a strange twist of events, the movie cover actually helped