Skip to main content

More Childhood Trauma Brought To You By The 80's (And Poltergeist)

Last month I wrote about haunted house movies and a few nights ago I wrote about Nightmare on Elm Street so it feels somehow fitting that tonight I talk about Poltergeist. (A haunted house movie from my childhood.)

Proving, yet again, that my view of the world is strangely skewed, I actually think of Poltergeist as a, "kid's movie." But I've heard plenty of my friends classify this movie as, "one that screwed me up as a kid." or "a movie that scared the crap out of me when I was growing up."

On a related note, did you know that Poltergeist is turning 30 this year? While it's commonly accepted that the movie is still wildly popular, I'd love to get my hands on some stats from places like Netflix, confirming how many people are still watching and enjoying it.

I suspect there's a couple of major reasons that people still love Poltergeist:
  1. Spielberg. Regardless of which rumors you believe about his level of involvement in the film, it simply drips with his style. And regardless of how you may feel about him or his movies, as I've written before, the man is a movie-making genius. 
  2. Primal fears. While the guts of the story are comfortable, approachable, "everyday", and maybe even a bit silly at times - the "scares" are so basic and rooted in childhood that they continue to work (30 years later.) Fear of the dark. Monsters in our closet. What happens when we die? Storms. Clowns. Toys coming to life. 
  3. Controversy, conspiracy, and mythos. Surrounded by untimely deaths, unique effects practices, and producer / director debates, everyone wants to muse over the various "curses" attached with this movie.
And just for laughs, lets talk about that first point for a minute. Spielberg wrote and produced the movie. Tobe Hooper (probably best know for directing The Texas Chainsaw Massacre) directed the movie. There's endless amounts of rumor and conjecture about which of them"really" directed Poltergeist. And while I maintain that the movie simply stinks of Spielberg's style, the direction definitely has Hooper's stamp on it.

People get too caught up in the story and have a near impossible time separating that from the direction. Shots, angles, framing, and the strange, silent way characters stare vacantly are all Hooper's doing. While the comfortable, suburban humor of the story is all Spielberg. The combination of their concepts made Poltergeist unique in the genre (at the time) and allows it to hold up, even now.

And speaking of the story, Poltergeist has this undertone (as do many 80's horror flicks) of "something lurking beneath the surface." It's the rotten apple metaphor - this idea that everything looks so perfect on the outside but is evil on the inside.

While popularized in the 80's, this idea is not new to horror, growing out of classic gothic fiction. To this point, Poltergeist actually ends as all gothic tales do: with the destruction of the home. The place it strays the most is in the hidden evil: in a true gothic tale, the family would be hiding a malevolence while in Poltergeist it's the culture or community that's harboring something terrible inside.

...And, unsurprisingly, there's a 2015 remake in the works.

Okay - I'm thinking it's wrap up time here.

Children of the 80's, join me in thanking the movie industry for scaring us into the horror fans we are today. Or something like that.

You can watch the Poltergeist trailer here:

Popular posts from this blog

Rebuttal: 17 Disturbing Horror Movies You Will Never Watch Again

When I'm not watching movies, I'm reading about movies. I stumble across all kinds of articles, blog posts, book excerpts, etc. in my quest to absorb as much movie knowledge as possible.

Now, I'm snotty and loud-mouthed and opinionated but I'd never begrudge another human their opinion. Seriously. You're absolutely welcome to have any opinion about any thing you want. However, I must warn you, if I think your opinion is stupid, I'm absolutely going to say so.

I've recently stumbled on an article completely brimming with so many idiotic opinions that I'm actually compelled to craft a response.

Here's the gist of the original article: there are some horror movies out there that are so disturbing, you'll only ever want to watch them once. I've have taken her original list and refuted her claims without pulling her entire article over. You can read the original article here.

Let's start at the beginning, with her opening statement:
"Hor…

But The Flesh Is Weak: Cronenberg's Body Horrors

Body horror; something that effects each one of us as we are made of squishy, fallible, and finite flesh. Tackled many times in many ways throughout the years, body horror will stick with us until we finally learn to lose these weak, human bodies and begin existing in some other form.

There are many lenses through which to view body horror, lets talk about a few quickly before talking about some specific films in this genre.


Science and Technology
We depend on technology, especially in regards to our flimsy, fleshy bodies. Hip replacements, new hearts, brain surgery, iron lungs, cheek implants, etc. We have limited abilities and a limited lifespan, so we lean on technology to increase both. But what happens when we take that melding of mechanical and organic too far? Horror and scifi have taught us that going too far can lead to frighteningly devastating consequences and monstrous creations. (SpeciesRobocopFrankenstein, etc.)


Gender
Much of body horror is related to or revolves arou…

Pet Sematary

I learned a really interesting lesson the other night: no matter how many times you've seen a movie on a small screen, you haven't really seen it until you've done so on the big screen. Thus begins my story of realization in which I discover Pet Sematary (seemingly for the first time) and develop a theory that it might actually have been directed by David Lynch (this last bit being hyperbole, of course–but I've got a strong case for it, so stick with me).

Over the years, I've watched Pet Sematary a handful of times and while I know all the major plot points (and always remembered Denise Crosby as being completely awful), I definitely feel like I've seen a completely different movie this time around.

In case you're coming in late and don't know how the story goes, here's the $.25 of it: family moves into house positioned (oddly close) to an Indian burial ground. The neighbor is friendly (albeit creepy). The road they are on has absolutely no regular…