Skip to main content

More Childhood Trauma Brought To You By The 80's (And Poltergeist)

Last month I wrote about haunted house movies and a few nights ago I wrote about Nightmare on Elm Street so it feels somehow fitting that tonight I talk about Poltergeist. (A haunted house movie from my childhood.)

Proving, yet again, that my view of the world is strangely skewed, I actually think of Poltergeist as a, "kid's movie." But I've heard plenty of my friends classify this movie as, "one that screwed me up as a kid." or "a movie that scared the crap out of me when I was growing up."

On a related note, did you know that Poltergeist is turning 30 this year? While it's commonly accepted that the movie is still wildly popular, I'd love to get my hands on some stats from places like Netflix, confirming how many people are still watching and enjoying it.

I suspect there's a couple of major reasons that people still love Poltergeist:
  1. Spielberg. Regardless of which rumors you believe about his level of involvement in the film, it simply drips with his style. And regardless of how you may feel about him or his movies, as I've written before, the man is a movie-making genius. 
  2. Primal fears. While the guts of the story are comfortable, approachable, "everyday", and maybe even a bit silly at times - the "scares" are so basic and rooted in childhood that they continue to work (30 years later.) Fear of the dark. Monsters in our closet. What happens when we die? Storms. Clowns. Toys coming to life. 
  3. Controversy, conspiracy, and mythos. Surrounded by untimely deaths, unique effects practices, and producer / director debates, everyone wants to muse over the various "curses" attached with this movie.
And just for laughs, lets talk about that first point for a minute. Spielberg wrote and produced the movie. Tobe Hooper (probably best know for directing The Texas Chainsaw Massacre) directed the movie. There's endless amounts of rumor and conjecture about which of them"really" directed Poltergeist. And while I maintain that the movie simply stinks of Spielberg's style, the direction definitely has Hooper's stamp on it.

People get too caught up in the story and have a near impossible time separating that from the direction. Shots, angles, framing, and the strange, silent way characters stare vacantly are all Hooper's doing. While the comfortable, suburban humor of the story is all Spielberg. The combination of their concepts made Poltergeist unique in the genre (at the time) and allows it to hold up, even now.

And speaking of the story, Poltergeist has this undertone (as do many 80's horror flicks) of "something lurking beneath the surface." It's the rotten apple metaphor - this idea that everything looks so perfect on the outside but is evil on the inside.

While popularized in the 80's, this idea is not new to horror, growing out of classic gothic fiction. To this point, Poltergeist actually ends as all gothic tales do: with the destruction of the home. The place it strays the most is in the hidden evil: in a true gothic tale, the family would be hiding a malevolence while in Poltergeist it's the culture or community that's harboring something terrible inside.

...And, unsurprisingly, there's a 2015 remake in the works.

Okay - I'm thinking it's wrap up time here.

Children of the 80's, join me in thanking the movie industry for scaring us into the horror fans we are today. Or something like that.

You can watch the Poltergeist trailer here:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rebuttal: 17 Disturbing Horror Movies You Will Never Watch Again

When I'm not watching movies, I'm reading about movies. I stumble across all kinds of articles, blog posts, book excerpts, etc. in my quest to absorb as much movie knowledge as possible. Now, I'm snotty and loud-mouthed and opinionated but I'd never begrudge another human their opinion. Seriously. You're absolutely welcome to have any opinion about any thing you want. However, I must warn you, if I think your opinion is stupid, I'm absolutely going to say so. I've recently stumbled on an article completely  brimming with so many idiotic opinions that I'm actually compelled to craft a response. Here's the gist of the original article: there are some horror movies out there that are so disturbing , you'll only ever want to watch them once. I've have taken her original list and refuted her claims without pulling her entire article over. You can read the original article here . Let's start at the beginning, with her opening statement

Contracted Or I Just Watched A Zombie Movie

Seems like horror fans fall into two buckets these days: zombie lovers and zombie haters. That dividing line just keeps getting deeper and darker the more zombies gain "mainstream popularity". I currently fall into the "I am so tired of zombies I could puke" bucket. I haven't stopped  watching zombie movies so much as I've started avoiding them at all costs, literally watching every other subgenre offering I stumble onto, regardless of how terrible it is. I seriously re-watched Wishmaster  this past week. That's how far out of my way I've been going to avoid the significant number of zombie movies flooding Netflix. Then I accidentally watched one. Contracted - 2013 I'm sure it was partially due to the really terrible movie synopsis that Netflix provided, which I'm prepared to admit that they may have nothing to do with and  that I likely didn't read it very well. In a strange twist of events, the movie cover actually helped

Mother!

Alright friends and readers–this one is probably doubly filled with typos and grammar errors because I wrote it while angry. Good luck and happy reading. There are unpopular opinions in every realm. As a film student, you can truly strike a nerve when you say things like, "I fucking hate the self-indulgence of independent films and the way people idolize them." Or, you know, "Low lighting and slow pacing does not a good movie make." Or whatever. You can of course, objectively, understand how this happens. When you are creating art–when you are outside the system  so to speak–you are free to explore things (subjects, techniques, etc.) that may need to be addressed and that freedom can become intoxicating and go to one's head. While it may seem only right  or only fair  to respect and accept each creative endeavor that every artist undertakes, it is unreasonable to believe that the world will remain forever patient with the self-obsession artists have. Th