Skip to main content

My Belated Friday the 13th Post

The great trifecta of horror: Halloween, Nightmare on Elm Street, & Friday the 13th. I've been tackling them, one at a time, and being that yesterday was (in fact) Friday the 13th, it seemed a fitting time to finally write about the movie.

Before I jump into the movie itself, let's talk for a minute about why these three film franchises are so very important to the horror genre. Each falls into the subgenre of "slasher films" which are commonly believed to have grown out of Psycho and Peeping Tom. The ways in which they conform to and break free of that genre makes them interesting, influential, and lasting.

Everything about these movies, down to their names, is designed to elicit fear in it's viewers.

Halloween - A day when it's believed that sprits can walk the Earth amongst the living.
Directed by John Carpenter. Released in 1978.

What's it got?
  • Halloween is remarkably "un-gory" (much like Psycho itself.) Being considered a large piece of "exploitation cinema" and bearing a name that implies a graphic kind of killing, being subtle is unusual.
  • Killer POV. Although borrowed from Psycho and Peeping Tom, Halloween is unique among is peers for offering us the killer's perspective during murders. The true beauty of the killer POV is that it implicates the audience in the murders; making us more than just coconspirators it turns us into killers ourselves. (We'll see this again in Friday the 13th.)
  • It's got a nod to the Final Girl. Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) very nearly defeats the killer on her own. She's a step closer to being a Final Girl than any of the B movie queens of the 50's but she actually pales in comparison to Sally Hardesty (Marilyn Burns) of Texas Chainsaw Massacre or even Nancy Thompson (Heather Langenkamp) of Nightmare on Elm Street.


Nightmare on Elm Street - Nightmares, terrible dreams that scare us.
Directed by Wes Craven. Released in 1984.

What's it got? (I'll keep this one short since I just wrote about it a few days ago.)
  • Personality! Freddy is no mindless killing machine - he's a true character.
  • A great Final Girl. Nancy doesn't just escape by accident, she proactively defeats Freddy.
  • A terrific gore factor. 


Friday the 13th - Traditionally believed to be an unlucky day when bad things happen.

Directed by Sean Cunningham. Released 1980.

What's it got?
  • A female killer. Not as uncommon nowadays but fairly irregular when it was released. Particularly when looking as slasher movies. There's a gender argument to be made here - one that revolves around genitalia and penetration - but I'll leave that be for now.
  • Red herrings and a twist ending. Friday the 13th is one of the primary forerunners in the art of tossing out plenty of "fake leads", implied guilt, and possible suspects, none of which tell the audience who the killer really is.
  • A morality lesson (that we now think of as, "common place" in a slasher film.) We all know who dies in a horror movie: the kids who have pre-marital sex, the kids who use drugs, the kids who "misbehave" or otherwise break polite societal rules.
So, Friday the 13th. Man oh man did mainstream critics hate this movie when it came out. Which, as we all know, is usually reason enough for audience's to love something. And, despite that mainstream slamming, Friday the 13th has gone on to become a much loved, genre "classic." (The magic of bad press, I tell you.)

I think one of the most interesting things about this movie is that you're really routing for the villain. You really love to hate the group of terrorized kids - they're completely douchey - and you really just want Jason to hack them to bits in creative and excessive ways.

Half the fun of a good slasher flick is tabulating and discussing the various ways the characters are dispatched. It's like a game: who do you think will be the next to die and how will it happen?

Despite what critics tell you, you don't need to feel bad. It's okay to hate those kids. The killing isn't real. It's only a movie. You're not some deranged sicko. Rejoice in your vicarious killing.

But seriously though, this kind of horror breeds audience participation and regardless of the gruesome nature of the material, it truly engages people's imaginations. As well as their critical thinking skills; when you're not betting on who bites it next, you're often discussing how you would escape or how you would defeat the killer.


Okay. Okay. Wrap up time.

Us horror fans owe a lot to the original Halloween, Nightmare on Elm Street, and Friday the 13th movies. Despite criticisms, remakes, reboots, and countless sequels, these original pieces will forever remain pillars in the horror genre foundation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rebuttal: 17 Disturbing Horror Movies You Will Never Watch Again

When I'm not watching movies, I'm reading about movies. I stumble across all kinds of articles, blog posts, book excerpts, etc. in my quest to absorb as much movie knowledge as possible.

Now, I'm snotty and loud-mouthed and opinionated but I'd never begrudge another human their opinion. Seriously. You're absolutely welcome to have any opinion about any thing you want. However, I must warn you, if I think your opinion is stupid, I'm absolutely going to say so.

I've recently stumbled on an article completely brimming with so many idiotic opinions that I'm actually compelled to craft a response.

Here's the gist of the original article: there are some horror movies out there that are so disturbing, you'll only ever want to watch them once. I've have taken her original list and refuted her claims without pulling her entire article over. You can read the original article here.

Let's start at the beginning, with her opening statement:
"Hor…

"I live, I love, I slay & I am Content."

Let me tell you a little about myself; something real about the home I grew up in. There were lots of people around all the time. I was the only child. And, thankfully, I wasn't treated as such. Much like today, I was just the shortest member of the household.

But what's that really mean? Above and beyond it means that I had many influences growing up. For this entry, my father's influence is the most important.

My father loves arms and armor. He loves history and mythology and the art of warfare. And as any good father would, he shared these passions with me as a kid. I remember him making me wooden swords to play with. We played chess together. And I remember him reading me Greek myths and comic books before bed. He also shared his nerdy love of scifi, fantasy, and horror movies with me.

For all of this, I am grateful. And I am now passionate about the same things.

Spoiler alert: the following statement is not a dick joke. I have a love of swords. And barbarians and slay…

Don't Be Afraid Of The Dark - Another Lesson in Not Letting Homeownership Drive You Mad

There's a great history of horror films with "don't" in their titles
Don't Go In the Woods (1981)Don't Go In The House (1980)Don't Look In The Basement (1973)Don't Answer The Phone (1980)Don't Open The Door (1975)Don't Open The Window (1974)Don't Go Near The Park (1981)Etc. These titles suggest horror audiences aren't bright enough to realize the movies they are watching are warnings (premarital sex will make masked slashers target you, mess with nature and you'll end up with an uncontrollable monster, play your heavy metal records backwards and demons will come out of your lawn, etc.) But they also offer sound advise within the context of each film; not following these warnings will get you killed.

Then there's Don't Be Afraid of The Dark, where the oposite seems to be true. The title doesn't actually read as a warning, although the warning is implied there. It actually reads as a wheedling ploy by whatever creature is…