Skip to main content

Bug: paranoia, terror, and redemption.

I've been ignoring Bug for years - which is silly because it's directed by William Friedkin (best known for directing The French Connection and The Exorcist in the 70's).

Perhaps it's the cover: It looks like some super-low budget, "independent movie" about some kind of giant cockroach infestation. (Like that segment in Creepshow, "They're creeping up on you!" where the germ-o-phobic old man's apartment is flooded with bugs - classic!) Now, I'm not scared of bugs, per se, but I'm just not excited about bug movies.

Side note: Way back in college, I remember reading an article about why humans hate swarms of things (written from a sociology perspective) and why we thus feel frightened by subcultures and minorities. Great article - wish I could remember the details so I could write more about it here. You'll have to rely on your own Google-fu to track down this terrific piece of writing.

So recently (and I use "recently" in that typical way that I do which has little or no relation to actual time). I read though Rue Morgue's 200 Alternative Horror Movies You Need To See, and I decided to give Bug a chance.

Here's what happened: I didn't immediately fall in love with Ashley Judd but I am always impressed with her range and the ease with which she plays the perfect, stereo-typical-no-class-white-trash-un-educated broad. There's always something so genuine about her, regardless of who she's playing.

Michael Shannon, who I can only think of as his character in "Cecil B Demented," actually impressed me, as well. I'm sure people know him now, from larger movies (2013's Man of Steel, for one) but I never really considered him an actor of any note. Dear Michael Shannon, this is me, apologizing to you. 

Even after reading about the movie, I was still surprised by the nail-biting tension that built through the entire movie. The chemistry between Ashley Judd and Michael Shannon is fantastic; they play their insanity off one another so seamlessly - you could almost imagine that they're both actually nuts (and made for one another).

But the end of the movie... the level of insanity achieved within the last few moments was possibly too much for me to appreciate. While paranoia is a great idea to flirt with, Friedkin was a bit heavy-handed, leaning too hard on challenging the idea that they were paranoid, implying that there really was "something bigger" going on. And I think that actually turned me off a bit because the "something bigger" seemed to be "aliens" and boy oh boy am I disinterested in alien movies. (Well - evil, dabbling, abducting, human-farming, aliens).

Overall: I'm glad I finally broke down and gave it a chance (Thanks, Rue Morgue) but I won't be running out to buy a copy any time soon.


Watch the trailer here:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rebuttal: 17 Disturbing Horror Movies You Will Never Watch Again

When I'm not watching movies, I'm reading about movies. I stumble across all kinds of articles, blog posts, book excerpts, etc. in my quest to absorb as much movie knowledge as possible. Now, I'm snotty and loud-mouthed and opinionated but I'd never begrudge another human their opinion. Seriously. You're absolutely welcome to have any opinion about any thing you want. However, I must warn you, if I think your opinion is stupid, I'm absolutely going to say so. I've recently stumbled on an article completely  brimming with so many idiotic opinions that I'm actually compelled to craft a response. Here's the gist of the original article: there are some horror movies out there that are so disturbing , you'll only ever want to watch them once. I've have taken her original list and refuted her claims without pulling her entire article over. You can read the original article here . Let's start at the beginning, with her opening statement...

Escape From Tomorrow

I love creative people who are willing to take risks with their art. I appreciate the refusal to do things by the rules. I'm also terribly impatient with mediocrity. Enter  Escape From Tomorrow . Created by a team of rogue filmmakers, the movie was shot in the video mode of high-end still cameras. Actors shared scripts and shooting locations across their smartphones. Shot on location at Disney World, the parks were completely unaware this was all going on right under their mouse ears. I wanted to love Escape From Tomorrow. More than that, I wanted to be completely taken with its ingenuity and creativity and - oh yes - its originality. And there is really a simple brilliance to their covert plan; all families are roaming around the parks, taking videos and chatting on their phones. Just blend the fuck in, act like you belong, and you won't get caught. Too bad the movie can be summed up as: ambitious but Rubbish. As you can imagine (or possibly know), there was a ton of con...

Mother!

Alright friends and readers–this one is probably doubly filled with typos and grammar errors because I wrote it while angry. Good luck and happy reading. There are unpopular opinions in every realm. As a film student, you can truly strike a nerve when you say things like, "I fucking hate the self-indulgence of independent films and the way people idolize them." Or, you know, "Low lighting and slow pacing does not a good movie make." Or whatever. You can of course, objectively, understand how this happens. When you are creating art–when you are outside the system  so to speak–you are free to explore things (subjects, techniques, etc.) that may need to be addressed and that freedom can become intoxicating and go to one's head. While it may seem only right  or only fair  to respect and accept each creative endeavor that every artist undertakes, it is unreasonable to believe that the world will remain forever patient with the self-obsession artists have. Th...