Skip to main content

Funny Games

The beauty of a genre is the many, many branches it can fracture into. At its highest level, Funny Games may have elements that make it a horror movie. When you begin drilling down and looking more granularly at the movie, it's really somewhat of a thriller and absolutely part of a sub-genre I'm just calling "violence" or "violent film." That may sound hugely nebulous and as though many movies could fit into it but, the differentiator of movies that fit into the "violent movies" category is that their violent components  are for the sake of violence. We're not talking about ancillary explosions in the course of a daring escape here, we're talking about deliberate, violent actions with no purpose other than "being violent."

My editor says, "The word that comes to mind here is gratuitous." She's not wrong. The violent movies genre is literally defined by excess.

More often than not, dramas and thrillers (Eastern Promises) cross over into this sub-genre, but occasionally other horror movies wander in as well. (I'm thinking things like A Serbian Film and even gems out of the exploitation era like Slave of the Cannibal God.)

So what makes the movie scary?
I've never believed that Funny Games is about "being scary" - I've always felt it's entirely about discomfort; an emotional punch in the gut that is meant to "wake us" from our robotic consumption of media and linger with us, long after the movie ends. This read is supported by writer/director (Michael Haneke) saying he wasn’t making a horror movie, he was putting together a commentary on violence in media.

At every turn, Funny Games challenges our expectations and throws us jarring curveballs to keep us guessing: from the pounding, clanging, screaming, metal music slapped over the pastoral family scene in the opening credits, to Peter and Paul’s (our killers) abrupt switch from "friendly guys next door" to dispassionate killers, we are constantly wrestling with how to understand the message and motivation of the movie. 

With so may genre elements turned on their heads, we don't know what to trust or what to believe; the killers even tell us, “Don’t trust what you see.” Are the things we're seeing on the screen really happening or will we get some kind of relief when one of our protagonists wakes up from this horrible dream and tells us, "it wasn't real."

Peter and Paul tell us that they are going to kill the whole family, but we’ve heard that before. We’re tainted by our experiences. We assume that the family will escape in the end because that’s how movies work. This genre-based assumption sets us up to be surprised, unnerved, and uncomfortable when the family is actually killed. We also hold sacred the idea that children will not be killed in a movie and here, again, Funny Games goes against our expectations - and knows it. Paul even makes reference to this idea and laughs at us (the audience) for believing such a thing. 

Paul is such the instigator, continually trying to make us participate in the violence - then makes fun of us for our genre-based misconceptions and expectations. He wants us to become accomplices but doesn't actually seem to care about "having us on his side." He's simply looking for another reason to get under our skin. 

Anna tells Peter and Paul, “I don’t know what game you’re playing but I’m not going to join in.” She’s frustrated because she doesn’t understand their motive, or lack thereof. Here she speaks for the audience. We need our killers to be killing for a reason so we can label them as different from ourselves. To distance ourselves from their behavior. To believe we are better than them. To understand how to keep ourselves safe from others like them.

Their motive seems to be violence for the sake of violence. When asked, “Why are you doing this?” they respond, “Why not?” It's not simply this pointless violence that makes us uncomfortable, it is their lackluster execution that we find chilling. There is no passion in their actions; They don't even seem to be taking joy in their violence. We must grapple with how two young, apparently affluent, young men could become such monsters.

We are also subjected to long, quiet, “real-time” scenes that are excruciatingly slow and make us uncomfortable because they do not allow for any escape from the violence; we have to live every painful second along with the family. These moments are almost meditative in their own way - giving us time to really steep in Anna's soft, endless crying.

These scenes are emotionally complex and trying; how long can we, compassionate humans, be expected to sit by and helplessly watch this family suffer? How long can we listen to Anna cry before we should run for help? Without directly asking, the movie makes us ask ourselves, "How many times have we looked the other way when someone needed our help?" This is our punishment; we must suffer this humiliation and abuse with Anna and her family for every time we've chosen not to help someone in real life.

If you're not feeling drained from just reading this post, it's time for you to track down Funny Games and prepare yourself for a beating.

You can catch the Funny Games trailer here:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rebuttal: 17 Disturbing Horror Movies You Will Never Watch Again

When I'm not watching movies, I'm reading about movies. I stumble across all kinds of articles, blog posts, book excerpts, etc. in my quest to absorb as much movie knowledge as possible. Now, I'm snotty and loud-mouthed and opinionated but I'd never begrudge another human their opinion. Seriously. You're absolutely welcome to have any opinion about any thing you want. However, I must warn you, if I think your opinion is stupid, I'm absolutely going to say so. I've recently stumbled on an article completely  brimming with so many idiotic opinions that I'm actually compelled to craft a response. Here's the gist of the original article: there are some horror movies out there that are so disturbing , you'll only ever want to watch them once. I've have taken her original list and refuted her claims without pulling her entire article over. You can read the original article here . Let's start at the beginning, with her opening statement

Contracted Or I Just Watched A Zombie Movie

Seems like horror fans fall into two buckets these days: zombie lovers and zombie haters. That dividing line just keeps getting deeper and darker the more zombies gain "mainstream popularity". I currently fall into the "I am so tired of zombies I could puke" bucket. I haven't stopped  watching zombie movies so much as I've started avoiding them at all costs, literally watching every other subgenre offering I stumble onto, regardless of how terrible it is. I seriously re-watched Wishmaster  this past week. That's how far out of my way I've been going to avoid the significant number of zombie movies flooding Netflix. Then I accidentally watched one. Contracted - 2013 I'm sure it was partially due to the really terrible movie synopsis that Netflix provided, which I'm prepared to admit that they may have nothing to do with and  that I likely didn't read it very well. In a strange twist of events, the movie cover actually helped

Mother!

Alright friends and readers–this one is probably doubly filled with typos and grammar errors because I wrote it while angry. Good luck and happy reading. There are unpopular opinions in every realm. As a film student, you can truly strike a nerve when you say things like, "I fucking hate the self-indulgence of independent films and the way people idolize them." Or, you know, "Low lighting and slow pacing does not a good movie make." Or whatever. You can of course, objectively, understand how this happens. When you are creating art–when you are outside the system  so to speak–you are free to explore things (subjects, techniques, etc.) that may need to be addressed and that freedom can become intoxicating and go to one's head. While it may seem only right  or only fair  to respect and accept each creative endeavor that every artist undertakes, it is unreasonable to believe that the world will remain forever patient with the self-obsession artists have. Th