Skip to main content

Funny Games

The beauty of a genre is the many, many branches it can fracture into. At its highest level, Funny Games may have elements that make it a horror movie. When you begin drilling down and looking more granularly at the movie, it's really somewhat of a thriller and absolutely part of a sub-genre I'm just calling "violence" or "violent film." That may sound hugely nebulous and as though many movies could fit into it but, the differentiator of movies that fit into the "violent movies" category is that their violent components  are for the sake of violence. We're not talking about ancillary explosions in the course of a daring escape here, we're talking about deliberate, violent actions with no purpose other than "being violent."

My editor says, "The word that comes to mind here is gratuitous." She's not wrong. The violent movies genre is literally defined by excess.

More often than not, dramas and thrillers (Eastern Promises) cross over into this sub-genre, but occasionally other horror movies wander in as well. (I'm thinking things like A Serbian Film and even gems out of the exploitation era like Slave of the Cannibal God.)

So what makes the movie scary?
I've never believed that Funny Games is about "being scary" - I've always felt it's entirely about discomfort; an emotional punch in the gut that is meant to "wake us" from our robotic consumption of media and linger with us, long after the movie ends. This read is supported by writer/director (Michael Haneke) saying he wasn’t making a horror movie, he was putting together a commentary on violence in media.

At every turn, Funny Games challenges our expectations and throws us jarring curveballs to keep us guessing: from the pounding, clanging, screaming, metal music slapped over the pastoral family scene in the opening credits, to Peter and Paul’s (our killers) abrupt switch from "friendly guys next door" to dispassionate killers, we are constantly wrestling with how to understand the message and motivation of the movie. 

With so may genre elements turned on their heads, we don't know what to trust or what to believe; the killers even tell us, “Don’t trust what you see.” Are the things we're seeing on the screen really happening or will we get some kind of relief when one of our protagonists wakes up from this horrible dream and tells us, "it wasn't real."

Peter and Paul tell us that they are going to kill the whole family, but we’ve heard that before. We’re tainted by our experiences. We assume that the family will escape in the end because that’s how movies work. This genre-based assumption sets us up to be surprised, unnerved, and uncomfortable when the family is actually killed. We also hold sacred the idea that children will not be killed in a movie and here, again, Funny Games goes against our expectations - and knows it. Paul even makes reference to this idea and laughs at us (the audience) for believing such a thing. 

Paul is such the instigator, continually trying to make us participate in the violence - then makes fun of us for our genre-based misconceptions and expectations. He wants us to become accomplices but doesn't actually seem to care about "having us on his side." He's simply looking for another reason to get under our skin. 

Anna tells Peter and Paul, “I don’t know what game you’re playing but I’m not going to join in.” She’s frustrated because she doesn’t understand their motive, or lack thereof. Here she speaks for the audience. We need our killers to be killing for a reason so we can label them as different from ourselves. To distance ourselves from their behavior. To believe we are better than them. To understand how to keep ourselves safe from others like them.

Their motive seems to be violence for the sake of violence. When asked, “Why are you doing this?” they respond, “Why not?” It's not simply this pointless violence that makes us uncomfortable, it is their lackluster execution that we find chilling. There is no passion in their actions; They don't even seem to be taking joy in their violence. We must grapple with how two young, apparently affluent, young men could become such monsters.

We are also subjected to long, quiet, “real-time” scenes that are excruciatingly slow and make us uncomfortable because they do not allow for any escape from the violence; we have to live every painful second along with the family. These moments are almost meditative in their own way - giving us time to really steep in Anna's soft, endless crying.

These scenes are emotionally complex and trying; how long can we, compassionate humans, be expected to sit by and helplessly watch this family suffer? How long can we listen to Anna cry before we should run for help? Without directly asking, the movie makes us ask ourselves, "How many times have we looked the other way when someone needed our help?" This is our punishment; we must suffer this humiliation and abuse with Anna and her family for every time we've chosen not to help someone in real life.

If you're not feeling drained from just reading this post, it's time for you to track down Funny Games and prepare yourself for a beating.

You can catch the Funny Games trailer here:


Popular posts from this blog

Rebuttal: 17 Disturbing Horror Movies You Will Never Watch Again

When I'm not watching movies, I'm reading about movies. I stumble across all kinds of articles, blog posts, book excerpts, etc. in my quest to absorb as much movie knowledge as possible. Now, I'm snotty and loud-mouthed and opinionated but I'd never begrudge another human their opinion. Seriously. You're absolutely welcome to have any opinion about any thing you want. However, I must warn you, if I think your opinion is stupid, I'm absolutely going to say so. I've recently stumbled on an article completely  brimming with so many idiotic opinions that I'm actually compelled to craft a response. Here's the gist of the original article: there are some horror movies out there that are so disturbing , you'll only ever want to watch them once. I've have taken her original list and refuted her claims without pulling her entire article over. You can read the original article here . Let's start at the beginning, with her opening statement

Escape From Tomorrow

I love creative people who are willing to take risks with their art. I appreciate the refusal to do things by the rules. I'm also terribly impatient with mediocrity. Enter  Escape From Tomorrow . Created by a team of rogue filmmakers, the movie was shot in the video mode of high-end still cameras. Actors shared scripts and shooting locations across their smartphones. Shot on location at Disney World, the parks were completely unaware this was all going on right under their mouse ears. I wanted to love Escape From Tomorrow. More than that, I wanted to be completely taken with its ingenuity and creativity and - oh yes - its originality. And there is really a simple brilliance to their covert plan; all families are roaming around the parks, taking videos and chatting on their phones. Just blend the fuck in, act like you belong, and you won't get caught. Too bad the movie can be summed up as: ambitious but Rubbish. As you can imagine (or possibly know), there was a ton of con

The Witch (2015)

You know the drill - there's ALWAYS spoilers. Don't want the movie ruined for you, come back after you've seen it. Also - I'm still without an editor - typos and bad grammar await you! I keep hoping that the cultural obsession with zombies will end; literally every other damn movie that comes 'round seems to feature some sort of shambling, undead being bent on devouring the weak flesh of regular humans. Once upon a time, zombies have have been used as a metaphor for the blind consumerism created by our capitalist society, or the perceived depletion of resources by immigrants, or even the ravages of time and disease on our frail bodies. Now it seems that the deeper social commentary has been lost as audiences mindlessly consume "zombie fiction" in an attempt to keep up with trends. ( How very meta - a film buddy of mine commented on this assessment! ) All of this is just a sideways rant, leading up to my actual point: it seems that zombie may actually