Skip to main content

The Wolfman 2010

I don't always hate remakes but when I do, I tend to be vicious about it. I didn't want to hate the Wolfman remake and I kind of didn't. The remake was bad but so much more "meh" than that, I didn't end up feeling much of anything about it. 

Let me tell you what happened when I watched it. 
Wait. I'm getting ahead of myself.

Let's talk for a minute about the 90's remake of Dracula which is very stylized and has nothing to do with original story. What a beautiful movie with horrible, terrible, over-the-top acting. It's like everyone in the cast decided that they would embrace Expressionist film, add a pinch of Broadway, and then vocalize all their emotions. It's like a Spanish soap opera. 

The Wolfman is yet another example of a great cast not being able to save a terrible movie. Anything that stars Sir Anthony Hopkins is generally assumed to be awesome however, his looney performance in this movie is equal parts the exact same character he played in Dracula (Van Helsing) and Sam Kinison. He is so over-the top and so far from any character in the original Wolfman (which I adore) that I just couldn't take him, or the movie, seriously.

And what the hell was Benico del Toro doing in this movie? His patented brand of, "I barely speak English" cool that typically serves him well in every movie (Fear and Loathing In Las Vegas?!) just made him seem lost and out of place in this movie. Apparently "period pieces" are not a great match for him.

But wait.
Did I mention that Dracula is absolutely gorgeous to look at? It absolutely defined the esthetic of the horror genre of the time. You can thank Coppola for this lush vision and this genre benchmark.
I think there's some kind of synergy between the over-the-top acting and the film roots Dracula grew from. Because of that visual benchmark, I felt even more like Wolfman is lacking and ends up feeling flat; a complete disappointment because on the surface, it looks like it was heavily influenced by Dracula but, looking closer, it's just a shitty ripoff.

So we're left with crappy acting and merely tolerable visuals. 

The look and feel aren't the only places that The Wolfman falls down for me. It is essentially the same story as Jekyl and Hyde - our wrestling with the nature of man's duality. The message is that we are all good and evil. Society teaches us to control  and contain that "evil" but sometimes, it creeps out.

I love this exploration and it makes me want a werewolf movie where the "human form" increasingly becomes more prone to animal instinct and action (Wolf tackled that a bit but was WAY too cheesy. Ginger Snaps also sort of touched on this.) Wolfman wasn't well written enough to actually go out on this limb as far as I'd have hoped. 

And in the end...
Well, I honestly don't know - I fell asleep.

Watch the trailer here:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Witch (2015)

You know the drill - there's ALWAYS spoilers. Don't want the movie ruined for you, come back after you've seen it.

Also - I'm still without an editor - typos and bad grammar await you!

I keep hoping that the cultural obsession with zombies will end; literally every other damn movie that comes 'round seems to feature some sort of shambling, undead being bent on devouring the weak flesh of regular humans. Once upon a time, zombies have have been used as a metaphor for the blind consumerism created by our capitalist society, or the perceived depletion of resources by immigrants, or even the ravages of time and disease on our frail bodies. Now it seems that the deeper social commentary has been lost as audiences mindlessly consume "zombie fiction" in an attempt to keep up with trends. (How very meta - a film buddy of mine commented on this assessment!) All of this is just a sideways rant, leading up to my actual point: it seems that zombie may actually be lo…

Rebuttal: 17 Disturbing Horror Movies You Will Never Watch Again

When I'm not watching movies, I'm reading about movies. I stumble across all kinds of articles, blog posts, book excerpts, etc. in my quest to absorb as much movie knowledge as possible.

Now, I'm snotty and loud-mouthed and opinionated but I'd never begrudge another human their opinion. Seriously. You're absolutely welcome to have any opinion about any thing you want. However, I must warn you, if I think your opinion is stupid, I'm absolutely going to say so.

I've recently stumbled on an article completely brimming with so many idiotic opinions that I'm actually compelled to craft a response.

Here's the gist of the original article: there are some horror movies out there that are so disturbing, you'll only ever want to watch them once. I've have taken her original list and refuted her claims without pulling her entire article over. You can read the original article here.

Let's start at the beginning, with her opening statement:
"Hor…

The Babadook

Spoilers and typos! Enjoy.

We often look back nostalgically on childhood, envious of the joy we felt and the boundless imaginations we possessed. How conveniently we forget the other side of that coin: as children, we experience a depth of terror our adult selves continually try to recreate for cathartic entertainment.

When we try to bring those childhood fears to life on the screen, we often end up with movies about "things that go bump in the night," which is a somewhat superficial approach. While it does provide an opportunity for a supernatural experience, it ignores the root of our fear: the unknown. As children, we lack life experience. We lack nuance. We lack understanding. Not knowing creates in us fear. Yes, we fear what lurks in the darkness but we also fear the adult world because we do not understand how it works. The Babadook works to exploit both those fears.

The short story: a widowed mother of a young boy experiences a mental breakdown and tries to murder he…