Skip to main content

The Wolfman 2010

I don't always hate remakes but when I do, I tend to be vicious about it. I didn't want to hate the Wolfman remake and I kind of didn't. The remake was bad but so much more "meh" than that, I didn't end up feeling much of anything about it. 

Let me tell you what happened when I watched it. 
Wait. I'm getting ahead of myself.

Let's talk for a minute about the 90's remake of Dracula which is very stylized and has nothing to do with original story. What a beautiful movie with horrible, terrible, over-the-top acting. It's like everyone in the cast decided that they would embrace Expressionist film, add a pinch of Broadway, and then vocalize all their emotions. It's like a Spanish soap opera. 

The Wolfman is yet another example of a great cast not being able to save a terrible movie. Anything that stars Sir Anthony Hopkins is generally assumed to be awesome however, his looney performance in this movie is equal parts the exact same character he played in Dracula (Van Helsing) and Sam Kinison. He is so over-the top and so far from any character in the original Wolfman (which I adore) that I just couldn't take him, or the movie, seriously.

And what the hell was Benico del Toro doing in this movie? His patented brand of, "I barely speak English" cool that typically serves him well in every movie (Fear and Loathing In Las Vegas?!) just made him seem lost and out of place in this movie. Apparently "period pieces" are not a great match for him.

But wait.
Did I mention that Dracula is absolutely gorgeous to look at? It absolutely defined the esthetic of the horror genre of the time. You can thank Coppola for this lush vision and this genre benchmark.
I think there's some kind of synergy between the over-the-top acting and the film roots Dracula grew from. Because of that visual benchmark, I felt even more like Wolfman is lacking and ends up feeling flat; a complete disappointment because on the surface, it looks like it was heavily influenced by Dracula but, looking closer, it's just a shitty ripoff.

So we're left with crappy acting and merely tolerable visuals. 

The look and feel aren't the only places that The Wolfman falls down for me. It is essentially the same story as Jekyl and Hyde - our wrestling with the nature of man's duality. The message is that we are all good and evil. Society teaches us to control  and contain that "evil" but sometimes, it creeps out.

I love this exploration and it makes me want a werewolf movie where the "human form" increasingly becomes more prone to animal instinct and action (Wolf tackled that a bit but was WAY too cheesy. Ginger Snaps also sort of touched on this.) Wolfman wasn't well written enough to actually go out on this limb as far as I'd have hoped. 

And in the end...
Well, I honestly don't know - I fell asleep.

Watch the trailer here:

Popular posts from this blog

Rebuttal: 17 Disturbing Horror Movies You Will Never Watch Again

When I'm not watching movies, I'm reading about movies. I stumble across all kinds of articles, blog posts, book excerpts, etc. in my quest to absorb as much movie knowledge as possible.

Now, I'm snotty and loud-mouthed and opinionated but I'd never begrudge another human their opinion. Seriously. You're absolutely welcome to have any opinion about any thing you want. However, I must warn you, if I think your opinion is stupid, I'm absolutely going to say so.

I've recently stumbled on an article completely brimming with so many idiotic opinions that I'm actually compelled to craft a response.

Here's the gist of the original article: there are some horror movies out there that are so disturbing, you'll only ever want to watch them once. I've have taken her original list and refuted her claims without pulling her entire article over. You can read the original article here.

Let's start at the beginning, with her opening statement:
"Hor…

But The Flesh Is Weak: Cronenberg's Body Horrors

Body horror; something that effects each one of us as we are made of squishy, fallible, and finite flesh. Tackled many times in many ways throughout the years, body horror will stick with us until we finally learn to lose these weak, human bodies and begin existing in some other form.

There are many lenses through which to view body horror, lets talk about a few quickly before talking about some specific films in this genre.


Science and Technology
We depend on technology, especially in regards to our flimsy, fleshy bodies. Hip replacements, new hearts, brain surgery, iron lungs, cheek implants, etc. We have limited abilities and a limited lifespan, so we lean on technology to increase both. But what happens when we take that melding of mechanical and organic too far? Horror and scifi have taught us that going too far can lead to frighteningly devastating consequences and monstrous creations. (SpeciesRobocopFrankenstein, etc.)


Gender
Much of body horror is related to or revolves arou…

Pet Sematary

I learned a really interesting lesson the other night: no matter how many times you've seen a movie on a small screen, you haven't really seen it until you've done so on the big screen. Thus begins my story of realization in which I discover Pet Sematary (seemingly for the first time) and develop a theory that it might actually have been directed by David Lynch (this last bit being hyperbole, of course–but I've got a strong case for it, so stick with me).

Over the years, I've watched Pet Sematary a handful of times and while I know all the major plot points (and always remembered Denise Crosby as being completely awful), I definitely feel like I've seen a completely different movie this time around.

In case you're coming in late and don't know how the story goes, here's the $.25 of it: family moves into house positioned (oddly close) to an Indian burial ground. The neighbor is friendly (albeit creepy). The road they are on has absolutely no regular…